This is an old revision of the document!
This document compares multiple software update tools in order to implement the CIP software updates architecture. We compared them from different points of view such as:
* Hawkbit
* Mender.IO server
* HERE OTA community
* Custom Http server
* SWupdate + librsync
* meta-updater
* RAUC + Casync (command)
We compared several methods and read other comparison reports (see “Comparison references” below). All methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. For the next phase, we decided to go for the “SWupdate + librsync” method because it satisfies the requirements specified by the CIP Software Updates Architecture and Siemens has important experience using that method. We also decided to use Hawkbit on the server side for our initial prototype. Having said that, the project will be open to other update methods and tools and we welcome any contribution in that sense.
Finally, here is a document that contains a table where CIP members compared several software update methods:
* https://elinux.org/Secure_OTA_Update * https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/System_Update * https://mkrak.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/FOSS-NORTH_2018_Software_Updates.pdf * https://events.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Strategies-for-Developing-and-Deploying-your-Embedded-Applications-and-Images-Mirza-Krak-Mender.io_.pdf * http://events17.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/ELC2017_SWUpdate.pdf * https://events.static.linuxfound.org/sites/events/files/slides/linuxcon-japan-2016-softwre-updates-sangorrin.pdf * https://events.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/ELCE-2018-Update-Tools-BoF_Jan-Lubbe.pdf * https://elinux.org/images/f/f5/Embedded_Systems_Software_Update_for_IoT.pdf * https://elinux.org/images/3/31/Comparison_of_Linux_Software_Update_Technologies.pdf